4.7 Article

Titanium dioxide nanofibers integrated stainless steel filter for photocatalytic degradation of pharmaceutical compounds

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 258, 期 -, 页码 124-132

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.04.047

关键词

Electrospinning; Pharmaceutical pollutants; Photocatalytic filter; Poly(vinylidene fluoride); TiO2 nanofibers

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) [2E23943]
  2. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [2E23943] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A photocatalytically active stainless steel filter (P-SSF) was prepared by integrating electrospun TiO2 nanofibers on SSF surface through a hot-press process where a poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) nanofibers interlayer acted as a binder. By quantifying the photocatalytic oxidation of cimetidine under ultraviolet radiation and assessing the stability of TiO2 nanofibers integrated on the P-SSF against sonication, the optimum thickness of the TiO2 and PVDF layer was found to be 29 and 42 mu m, respectively. At 10 L/m(2) h flux, 40-90% of cimetidine was oxidized when the thickness of TiO2 layer increased from 10 to 29 mu m; however, no further increase of cimetidine oxidation was observed as its thickness increased to 84 mu m, maybe due to limited light penetration. At flux conditions of 10, 20, and 50 L/m(2) h, the oxidation efficiencies for cimetidine were found to be 89, 64, and 47%, respectively. This was attributed to reduced contact time of cimetidine within the TiO2 layer. Further, the degradation efficacy of cimetidine was stably maintained for 72 h at a flux of 10 L/m(2) h and a trans-filter pressure of 0.1-0.2 kPa. Overall, our results showed that it can potentially be employed in the treatment of effluents containing organic micropollutants. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据