4.7 Article

Comparing the joint effect of arsenic exposure, cigarette smoking and risk genotypes of vascular endothelial growth factor on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma and bladder cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 262, 期 -, 页码 1139-1146

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.08.056

关键词

Arsenic; Bladder cancer; Cigarette smoking; Upper urinary tract; Urothelial carcinoma; Vascular endothelial growth factor

资金

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC 95-2314-B-038-047-MY3 (1-3), NSC 95-2314-B-038-047-MY3 (2-3), NSC 95-2314-B-038-047-MY3 (3-3)]
  2. Department of Health, Taiwan [DOH100-TD-C-111-008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arsenic exposure and cigarette smoking are environmental risk factors for urothelial carcinoma (UC). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the key regulator of angiogenesis in various malignancies. This study investigates the joint effect of arsenic exposure, cigarette smoking, and VEGF polymorphisms on UC risk. This was a hospital-based case-control study consisting of 730 histopathologically confirmed UC cases, including 470 bladder cancers, 260 upper urinary tract UCs (UUTUCs), and 850 age-matched controls, recruited from September 1998 to December 2009. UC risk was estimated by odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals using unconditional logistic regression. Ever smokers with high arsenic exposure had significantly increased risks of 5.7 and 6.4 for bladder cancer and UUTUC, respectively. Moreover, ever smokers with high arsenic exposure carrying 1 or 2 risk genotypes of the VEGF gene had a significantly increased risk of 6.6 for bladder cancer and a strikingly higher risk of 9.9 for UUTUC. Additionally, UUTUC cases with high arsenic exposure carrying 1 or 2 risk genotypes of the VEGF gene had a non-significant increased risk of advanced tumor stage. Our findings suggest that arsenic exposure, cigarette smoking, and risk genotypes of VEGF contribute to a higher risk of UUTUC than of bladder cancer. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据