4.7 Article

Selective lanthanide sorption and mechanism using novel hybrid Lewis base (N-methyl-N-phenyl-1,10-phenanthroline-2-carboxamide) ligand modified adsorbent

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 252, 期 -, 页码 313-320

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.03.020

关键词

Eu(III) and Sm(III); Hybrid Lewis base adsorbent; High kinetics; Selectivity and sensitivity; Reversibility

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [24860070]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24860070] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to develop a highly selective Lewis base adsorbent to investigate the selective sorption and recovery of Eu(III) and Sm(III) from wastewater. The oxygen and nitrogen donor atoms containing Lewis base N-methyl-N-phenyl-1,10-phenanthroline-2-carboxamide (MePhPTA) ligand was synthesized and subsequently an adsorbent was prepared by direct immobilization onto mesoporous silica. Determined maximum adsorption capacities were 125.63 and 124.38 mg/g for Eu(III) and Sm(III), respectively. Experiments with mixed-cations solutions showed that the sequence of preferential adsorption was Eu(III) > Sm(III). The lanthanide sorption by hybrid Lewis base adsorbent (HyLBA) was not adversely affected by the presence of sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, chloride, sulfate and nitrate ions due to strong affinity between hard Lewis acid lanthanide and hard Lewis base adsorbent. The crystallography for the Sm-MePhPTA complex suggested that MePhPTA was strongly coordinated to Sm(III) with oxygen and nitrogen by forming a stable complex with two 5-membered rings. The data clarified that bond lengths between Sm(III) and amide oxygen (2.475 angstrom) were shorter than Sm-N (2.662 angstrom) in phenanthroline moiety indicating strong oxygen driven HyLBA. The results suggested that HyLBA has a good prospect of promising applications for separation/sorption of lanthanide ions from effluents. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据