4.7 Article

Photodegradation kinetics and transformation products of ketoprofen, diclofenac and atenolol in pure water and treated wastewater

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 244, 期 -, 页码 516-527

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.10.039

关键词

Wastewater effluent; UV photolysis; Pharmaceutical compounds; Transformation products; Transformation pathways

资金

  1. COST Action 636
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) [PTDC/AMB/65702/2006, PEst-OE/EQB/LA0004/2011, PEst-C/EQB/LA0006/2011, SFRH/PROTEC/49449/2009, SFRH/BPD/30800/2006]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/AMB/65702/2006, SFRH/BPD/30800/2006] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pharmaceutical compounds such as ketoprofen, diclofenac and atenolol are frequently detected at relatively high concentrations in secondary effluents from wastewater treatment plants. Therefore, it is important to assess their transformation kinetics and intermediates in subsequent disinfection processes, such as direct ultraviolet (UV) irradiation. The photodegradation kinetics of these compounds using a medium pressure (MP) lamp was assessed in pure water, as well as in filtered and unfiltered treated wastewater. Ketoprofen had the highest time- and fluence-based rate constants in all experiments, whereas atenolol had the lowest values, which is consistent with the corresponding decadic molar absorption coefficient and quantum yield. The fluence-based rate constants of all compounds were evaluated in filtered and unfiltered wastewater matrices as well as in pure water. Furthermore, transformation products of ketoprofen, diclofenac and atenolol were identified and monitored throughout the irradiation experiments, and photodegradation pathways were proposed for each compound. This enabled the identification of persistent transformation products, which are potentially discharged from WWTP disinfection works employing UV photolysis. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据