4.7 Article

Design and scale-up of an oxidative scrubbing process for the selective removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 215, 期 -, 页码 49-56

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.02.028

关键词

Hydrogen sulfide; Hydrogen peroxide; Selective absorption; Biogas upgrading; Biogas desulfurization

资金

  1. FFG - Die Oesterreichische Forschungsfoerderungsgesellschaft, Klima- und Energiefonds
  2. Biogas Bruck/Leitha GmbH
  3. BIONIK Filtersysteme GmbH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reliable and selective removal of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is an essential part of the biogas upgrading procedure in order to obtain a marketable and competitive natural gas substitute for flexible utilization. A promising biogas desulfurization technology has to ensure high separation efficiency regardless of process conditions or H2S load without the use or production of toxic or ecologically harmful substances. Alkaline oxidative scrubbing is an interesting alternative to existing desulfurization technologies and is investigated in this work. In experiments on a stirred tank reactor and a continuous scrubbing column in laboratory-scale, H2S was absorbed from a gas stream containing large amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) into an aqueous solution prepared from sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). The influence of pH, redox potential and solution aging on the absorption efficiency and the consumption of chemicals was investigated. Because of the irreversible oxidation reactions of dissolved H2S with H2O2, high H2S removal efficiencies were achieved while the CO2 absorption was kept low. At an existing biogas upgrading plant an industrial-scale pilot scrubber was constructed, which efficiently desulfurizes 180 m(3)/h of raw biogas with an average removal efficiency of 97%, even at relatively high and strongly fluctuating H2S contents in the crude gas. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据