4.7 Article

Hydrothermal sulfidation and floatation treatment of heavy-metal-containing sludge for recovery and stabilization

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 217, 期 -, 页码 307-314

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.03.025

关键词

Hydrothermal sulfidation; Heavy-metal-containing sludge; Metal sulfide; Stabilization; Floatation

资金

  1. China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists [50925417]
  2. Key National Natural Science Foundation of China [50830301]
  3. National high technology research and development program of China [2010AA065203]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [ncet-10-0840]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the application of hydrothermal sulfidation and floatation to treat the heavy-metal-containing sludge for recovery and stabilization. After the hydrothermal sulfidation, the sulfidation percentage of zinc and lead reach up to 85.0% and 75.4%, respectively. 33.3% of Zn, 58.9% of Pb and 68.8% of Cu can be recovered from the sludge by floatation. The lower recovery of ZnS attributes to its surface and structural characteristics. To compare these characteristics, three types of synthetic metal sulfide (ZnS, PbS and CuS) were prepared and examined with XRD, SEM and TEM. The poor floatability of the finely dispersed, round shape of ZnS can be improved by crystal modification in hydrothermal condition. With increasing the temperature and reaction time, the grain size of the ZnS increased from 7.95 nm to 44.28 nm and the recovery of Zn increased to from 33.3% to 72.8%. The TCLP results indicate that all the leached heavy metal concentrations of floatation tailings are under the allowable limit. No obvious increase of heavy metal concentration was observed in continuous leaching procedure. The presence of alkaline compounds after hydrothermal sulfidation might act as mineralogical scavengers of dissolved heavy metal released by sulfide oxidation to avoid the heavy metal pollution. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据