4.7 Article

Removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from aqueous solution using plant residue materials as a biosorbent

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 188, 期 1-3, 页码 436-442

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.114

关键词

Plant residues; Biosorbent; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; Sorption mechanism; Wastewater treatment

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [R5100105]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20977081, 41071210, 20737002]
  3. Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of China [200765]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To elucidate biosorption mechanism and removal efficiency of plant residues as a biosorbent to abate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in wastewater, sorption of PAHs onto wood chips (WC), ryegrass roots (RR), orange peels (OP), bamboo leaves (BL), and pine needles (PN) were investigated. The structural characterization of the biosorbents was analyzed by elemental composition, BET-N-2 surface area, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. PAHs sorption to the selected biosorbents were compared and correlated with their structures. Biosorption isotherms fit well with Freundlich equation and the mechanism was dominated by partition process. The magnitude of phenanthrene partition coefficients (K-d) followed the order of PN > BL > OP > RR > WC, ranged from 2484 +/- 24.24 to 5306 +/- 92.49 L/kg. Except the WC sample, the K-d values were negatively correlated with sugar content, polar index [(N + O)/C] of the biosorbents, while the aromatic component exhibited positive effects. For a given biosorbent of bamboo leaves, the carbon-normalized partition coefficients (K-oc) were linearly correlated with octanol-water partition coefficients (K-ow) of PAHs, i.e., log K-oc = 1.16 log K-ow - 1.21. The structure-effect relationship provides a reference to select and modify plant residues as a biosorbent with high efficiency to tackle organic pollutants. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据