4.7 Article

Thiol-functionalization of metal-organic framework by a facile coordination-based postsynthetic strategy and enhanced removal of Hg2+ from water

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 196, 期 -, 页码 36-43

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.069

关键词

Metal-organic frameworks; Functionalization; Coordinatively unsaturated metal centers; Postsynthetic strategy; Heavy metal removal

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [20971001]
  2. NSFC-CAS [10979014]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talent in University
  4. Ministry of Education, China [NCET-08-0617]
  5. Anhui University
  6. NSFC [20873128]
  7. Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of coordinatively unsaturated metal centers in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) provides an accessible way to selectively functionalize MOFs through coordination bonds. In this work, we describe thiol-functionalization of MOFs by choosing a well known three-dimensional (3D) Cu-based MOF, i.e. [Cu-3(BTC)(2)(H2O)(3)](n) (HKUST-1, BTC = benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate), by a facile coordination-based postsynthetic strategy, and demonstrate their application for removal of heavy metal ion from water. A series of [Cu-3(BTC)(2)](n) samples stoichiometrically decorated with thiol groups has been prepared through coordination bonding of coordinatively unsaturated metal centers in HKUST-1 with -SH group in dithioglycol. The obtained thiol-functionalized samples were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscope, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy, and N-2 sorption-desorption isothermal. Significantly, the thiol-functionalized [Cu-3(BTC)(2)](n) exhibited remarkably high adsorption affinity (K-d = 4.73 x 10(5) mL g(-1)) and high adsorption capacity (714.29 mg g(-1)) for Hg2+ adsorption from water, while the unfunctionalized HKUST-1 showed no adsorption of Hg2+ under the same condition. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据