4.7 Article

SO2 inhalation modulates the expression of pro-inflammatory and pro-apoptotic genes in rat heart and lung

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 185, 期 1, 页码 482-488

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.057

关键词

SO2 inhalation; Pro-inflammatory gene; Pro-apoptotic gene; Heart; Lung

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of P.R. China [20607013, 20877050, 20977060]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province [2009011046, 2009011049-3, 20051043]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (SRFDP) [20091401110002]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars of Shanxi Province
  5. Program for the Top Young Academic Leaders of Higher Learning Institutions of Shanxi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SO2 is a common air pollutant, and human exposure to SO2 has become increasingly widespread due to the combustion of fossil fuels. The epidemiological studies have linked SO2 exposure not only with many respiratory responses, but also with cardiovascular diseases. Also, its possible toxicity has been implicated by determining oxidative stress, DNA damage and membrane channel alteration in rat heart and lung. However, its detailed mechanisms remain unclear. In the present study, rats were treated with 7, 14 and 28 mg/m(3) SO2 for 6 h/day for 7 days, and the mRNA levels of TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta, iNOS, ICAM-1. Bax and Bcl-2 and subsequent insults were determined in the heart and lung. The results indicate that SO2 inhalation markedly elevated TNF-alpha and IL-1 beta mRNA levels and secretions, enhanced iNOS and ICAM-1 mRNA levels and the ratio of Bax/Bcl-2 in a concentration-dependent manner, and induced occurrence of apoptosis. This suggests that SO2 inhalation induced an inflammatory response and subsequent insults via modulating pro-inflammatory and pro-apoptotic genes in the heart and lung, which contributed to the increased risk of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据