4.7 Article

Comparative study of photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic properties of alachlor using different morphology TiO2/Ti photoelectrodes

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 192, 期 3, 页码 1812-1818

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.005

关键词

Photoelectrocatalytic; Alachlor; TiO2 nanotube array; Photoelectrode

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50978066]
  2. National Creative Research Groups of National Natural Science Foundation of China [50821002]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resources and Environment [2010DX03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wormhole-shaped TiO2/Ti (WT) and nanotube-shaped TiO2/Ti (TNT) photoelectrodes were prepared by anodic oxidation method. The morphology and structure were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). It was found that both crystal types of WT and TNT photoelectrodes were composed of anatase and rutile TiO2 phases: however TNT photoelectrodes had highly ordered nanostructure. The photoelectrochemical (PECH) and photoelectrocatalytic (PEC) properties of WT and TNT photoelectrodes were investigated by photocurrent transient, open-circuit potential and degradation rate of alachlor under the artificial solar light illumination. All results showed that TNT photoelectrodes prepared in NaF-Na2SO4 solution have more excellent photoelectron properties than WT photoelectrodes prepared in H2SO4 solution. The photocatalytic (PC) and PEC experiments of alachlor showed that PC and PEC activities of TNT photoelectrodes were superior to WT photoelectrodes. At applied bias potentials the degradation rate of alachlor at TNT photoelectrodes increased significantly to 94.5%. The higher PC and PEC performance of TNT photoelectrodes were ascribed to the long-range ordered structure and short-orientation diffusion distance of photogenerated carries. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据