4.7 Article

Template-free formation of vertically oriented TiO2 nanorods with uniform distribution for organics-sensing application

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 188, 期 1-3, 页码 363-368

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.125

关键词

Nanorod; Titanium dioxide; Mixed crystal effect; Sensing; Photocurrent

资金

  1. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [07SG37]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51072034]
  3. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B603]
  4. Cultivation Fund of the Key Scientific and Technical Innovation Project [708039]
  5. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [111-2-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-density arrays of vertically oriented TiO2 nanorods with uniform distribution on Ti foil have been formed through template-free oxidation of Ti in hydrogen peroxide solutions. Subsequent thermal treatment was applied for growing mixed crystal structures to pursue higher performance. Morphology characterization using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) shows a nanorod diameter in the range of 20-50 nm with a length of 1.5 mu m. X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurement demonstrates the crystallization of the TiO2 nanorods prior to thermal treatment and the formation of anatase and rutile mixed phase after thermal treatment. The mixed crystal TiO2 nanorods show a much higher performance than pure anatase in photoelectrochemical experiments. Steady-state photocurrent resulted from photocatalytic oxidation of organic compounds by TiO2 nanorods is employed as response signal in determination of the organics to yield a linear range of 0-1.1 mM for glucose. For other organics, an excellent linear relationship between the net steady-state photocurrent and the concentration of electrons transferred in exhaustive oxidation for these organics is obtained, which empowers the mixed crystal TiO2 nanorods to serve as versatile material in organics-sensing application. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据