4.7 Article

Removal of dimethyl sulfide utilizing activated carbon fiber-supported photocatalyst in continuous-flow system

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 191, 期 1-3, 页码 234-239

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.069

关键词

Adsorptional photocatalytic; Adsorption efficiency; SEM analysis; Titanium dioxide; Byproduct

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2010-0002506]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0002506] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study investigated the adsorptional photocatalytic decomposition (APD) efficiency of activated carbon fiber-supported TiO2 (ACF/TiO2) in a continuous-flow reactor for the removal of dimethyl sulfide (DMS). The SEM analysis identified that the ACF/TiO2 exhibited the same tridimensional shape as uncovered ACF and that a TiO2 photocatalyst could be embedded in the surface of the ACF. In the absence of UV light, the time-series removal efficiencies by ACF and the ACF/TiO2 units exhibited a similar pattern, which decreased gradually as it reached close to zero. However, the APD efficiency determined via the ACF/TiO2 with UV light remained at nearly 60% during the remaining courses of the 13-h period, after decreasing from a maximum APD of 80%. The APD efficiencies depended upon the weights of the TiO2 embedded into the ACFs, the UV sources, the relative humidity, and DMS input concentrations. During a long-term (219-h) APD test, the APD efficiencies dropped from 80% to ca 60% within 1 h after the initiation of the APD process and then fluctuated between 52% and 60%. No byproducts were measurable or observable in the effluent gas or on the ACF/TiO2 surface. Consequently, the continuous-flow ACF/TiO2 system could effectively be applied to control DMS without any significant functional deterioration. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据