4.7 Article

Chemical interferences when using high gradient magnetic separation for phosphate removal: Consequences for lake restoration

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 192, 期 3, 页码 995-1001

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.090

关键词

High gradient magnetic separation; Phosphorus; Eutrophication; Magnetic particles; Chemical interferences

资金

  1. Junta de Andalucia, Spain [RNM-6630]
  2. University of Granada [2953/07]
  3. MICINN (Spain) [MAT-2010-15101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A promising method for lake restoration is the treatment of lake inlets through the specific adsorption of phosphate (P) on strongly magnetizable particles (Fe) and their subsequent removal using in-flow high gradient magnetic separation (HGMS) techniques. In this work, we report an extensive investigation on the chemical interferences affecting P removal efficiencies in natural waters from 20 Mediterranean ponds and reservoirs. A set of three treatments were considered based on different Fe particles/P concentration ratios. High P removal efficiencies (>80%) were found in freshwater lakes (conductivities < 600 mu S cm(-1)). However, a significant reduction in P removal was observed for extremely high mineralized waters. Correlation analysis showed that major cations (Mg2+, Na+ and K+) and anions (SO42- and Cl-) played an essential role in P removal efficiency. Comparison between different treatments have shown that when increasing P and Fe concentrations at the same rate or when increasing Fe concentrations for a fixed P concentration, there exist systematic reductions in the slope of the regression lines relating P removal efficiency and the concentration of different chemical variables. These results evidence a general reduction in the chemical competition between P and other ions for adsorption sites on Fe particles. Additional analyses also revealed a reduction in water color, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and reactive silicate (Si) concentrations with the addition of Fe microparticles. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据