4.7 Article

A kinetic spectrophotometric method for simultaneous determination of phenol and its three derivatives with the aid of artificial neural network

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 192, 期 2, 页码 722-729

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.081

关键词

Kinetic spectrophotometry; Rhodamine B; Phenols; Chemometrics; Water samples

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC-21065007]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology of Nanchang University [SKLF-MB-201002, SKLF-TS-200919]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel kinetic spectrophotometric method was developed for determination of pyrocatechol, resorcin, hydroquinone and phenol based on their inhibitory effect on the oxidation of Rhodamine B (RhB) in acid medium at pH = 3.0. A linear relationship was observed between the inhibitory effect and the concentrations of the compounds. The absorbance associated with the kinetic reactions was monitored at the maximum wavelength of 557 nm. The effects of different parameters such as pH, concentration of RhB and KBrO3, and temperature of the reaction were investigated and optimum conditions were established. The linear ranges were 0.22-3.30, 0.108-0.828, 0.36-3.96 and 1.52-19.76 mu g mL(-1) for pyrocatechol, resorcin, hydroquinone and phenol, respectively, and their corresponding detection limits were 0.15, 0.044, 0.16 and 0.60 mu g mL(-1). The measured data were processed by several chemometrics methods, such as principal component regression (PCR), partial least squares (PLS) and artificial neural network (ANN), and a set of synthetic mixtures of these compounds was used to verify the established models. It was found that the prediction ability of PLS, PCR and RBF-ANN was similar, however, the RBF-ANN model did perform somewhat better than the other methods. The proposed method was also applied satisfactorily for the simultaneous determination of pyrocatechol, resorcin, hydroquinone and phenol in real water samples. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据