4.7 Article

Enhancing uranium solubilization in soils by citrate, EDTA, and EDDS chelating amendments

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 198, 期 -, 页码 224-231

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.10.026

关键词

Availability; Citrate; EDDS; EDTA; Phytoremediation; Uranium

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [CTM2009-07785]
  2. Empresa Nacional de Residuos Radiactivos (ENRESA)
  3. Spanish National Agency for Radioactive Management [0078000102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A systematic study was made of the effects of three soil amendments on the solubilization of uranium from a granitic soil. The aim was to optimize solubilization so as to enhance bioavailability for the purposes of remediation. The three amendments tested were with citrate, EDTA, and EDDS as chelating agents. The effects of pH, chelator concentration, and leaching time were studied. The most important factor in uranium solubilization was found to be the pH. In the absence of chelating agents, the greatest solubilization was obtained for alkaline conditions, with values representing about 15% of the total uranium activity in the bulk soil. There were major differences in uranium solubilization between the different amendments. The citrate treatment was the most efficient at acidic pH, particularly with the greatest concentration of citrate tested (50 mmol kg(-1)) after 6 days of treatment. Under these conditions, the uranium concentration in solution was greater by a factor of 356 than in the control suspension, and represented some 63% of the uranium concentration in the bulk soil. Under alkaline conditions, the EDTA and EDDS treatments gave the greatest uranium activity concentrations in solution, but these concentrations were much lower than those with the citrate amendment, and were not very different from the control results. The uranium extraction yield with EDDS amendment was greater than with EDTA. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据