4.7 Article

Effect of alkali cations on heterogeneous photo-Fenton process mediated by Prussian blue colloids

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 182, 期 1-3, 页码 665-671

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.083

关键词

Prussian blue; Heterogeneous catalysis; Photo-Fenton; Cation effect; Molecular recognition

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50973077, 20771047]
  2. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China [06-K4-26]
  3. Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Science and Engineering, Jiangsu of China [2D051204]
  4. Creative Project of Postgraduate of Jiangsu Province [CX09S-049Z]
  5. Suzhou Environmental Protection Bureau, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article evaluates Prussian blue (iron hexacyanoferrate) colloids as a heterogeneous photo-Fenton catalyst for the degradation of Rhodamine B. The emphasis is laid on the effects of alkali metal cations on the photo-Fenton process. The facts show that alkali cations strongly affect the degradation rate of organic species.The degradation rates of Rhodamine B, Malachite Green, and Methyl Orange in the presence of KCl, KNO(3), and K(2)SO(4), respectively, are faster than their degradation rates in the presence of the corresponding sodium salts. The average degradation rates of Rhodamine B in 0.2 M KCl, NaCl, RbCl, and CsCl solution, decline in sequence, and the rate in KCl solution is greater than that without any salt added deliberately. Thus, potassium ions accelerate the degradation rate, but sodium, rubidium, and cesium ions slow the rate. The order of the rates is R(K) > R > R(Na) > R(Rb) > R(Cs), which is consistent with that of the voltammetric oxidation currents of Prussian blue in the corresponding cation solutions. This phenomenon is attributed to the molecular recognition of the microstructure in Prussian blue nanoparticles to the alkali cations. The reaction mechanism of the photo-Fenton process has also been explored. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据