4.7 Article

Effect of free nitrous acid as inhibitors on nitrate reduction by a biological nutrient removal sludge

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 175, 期 1-3, 页码 518-523

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.036

关键词

Nitrate; Reduction; Biological nutrient removal; Free nitrous acid; Inhibition

资金

  1. National High-tech R&D Program (863 Program) of China [2006AA06Z319]
  2. National Key Science and Technology Special Projects [2008ZX07317-007-105]
  3. Project of Beijing municipal education commission [PXM2008-014204-050843, PHR20090502]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrite has been commonly thought to have a broad inhibitory effect on bacterial metabolism. Little is known about the impact of nitrite on nitrate reduction with pH considered as an important factor. This study investigates the nitrite inhibition on nitrate reduction during denitrification under various pH conditions by using a biological nutrient removal (BNR) sludge. The results showed that nitrate reduction performance had a much stronger relationship with the free nitrous acid (FNA) than that of nitrite concentration, implying that FNA, rather than nitrite, is likely the real inhibitor on nitrate reduction. The nitrate reduction activity of the biomass was observed to be inhibited about 60% in the range of 0.01-0.025 mg HNO2-N/L and was totally inhibited when FNA level was greater than the threshold concentration (0.2 mg HNO2-N/L). Moreover, the recovery rate from inhibitory effect was found to be dependent much more strongly on the concentration of FNA, of which the biomass was exposed to during the inhibition period, than on the duration of the inhibition and the feeding mode of inhibitor. It was also found that nitrite reduction was significantly inhibited by FNA and the nitrite reduction rate was linear to nitrate reduction rate due to the inhibitory mechanism under which FNA may react with the enzymes involved in the denitrification process. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据