4.7 Article

Chlorine characterization and thermal behavior in MSW and RDF

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 178, 期 1-3, 页码 489-498

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.108

关键词

Chlorine; Municipal solid waste (MSW); Waste incineration; Analytical methods; Volatilization; Corrosion

资金

  1. Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation [101056]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [90610020]
  3. National Program on Key Basic Research Project (973 Program) [2004CB719704]
  4. European Commission [CN/ASIA-LINK/025(110-744)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chlorine, as a key element causing high temperature corrosion and low efficiency in waste-to-energy plants, and its thermal behavior has widely drawn attention. In this study, the chlorine content in eight fractions of municipal solid waste (MSW) was quantified and characterized using five analytical methods. The influence of the operating temperature, and fuel additives like sulfur and silica on the volatilization of chlorine in combustion process was also investigated. The results showed: these fractions cover a wide range of chlorine content from 0.1 wt.% in wood to >6 wt.% in non-packaging plastics (dry basis). Polyvinylchloride (PVC) from packaging, electrical wire insulation etc. in plastics and chloride salts (mainly NaCl) in kitchen waste are the main sources of organic and inorganic chlorine. The increase of the operating temperature from 700 degrees C to 1000 degrees C has more influence on the HCl formation for kitchen waste than that for PVC. Sulfur addition leads to 20-40% higher HCl formation rate in most fractions. Silica supports the chlorine release at relatively low temperatures between 700 degrees C and 850 degrees C. These findings enhance to understand the thermal behavior of chlorine in MSW and RDF (refuse derived fuel) in waste-to-energy plants and lead to the suggestions for a fuel management for waste derived fuels in order to avoid chlorine induced corrosion. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据