4.7 Article

Photocatalytic degradation of three azo dyes using immobilized TiO2 nanoparticles on glass plates activated by UV light irradiation: Influence of dye molecular structure

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 168, 期 1, 页码 451-457

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.052

关键词

TiO2 nanoparticles; Photocatalysis; Electricity consumption; Azo dye; TOC

资金

  1. University of Tabriz, Iran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to discuss the effect of chemical structure on photocatalysis efficiency, the photocatalytic degradation of three commercial textile dyes (C.I. Acid Orange 10 (AO10), C.I. Acid Orange 12 (AO12) and C.I. Acid Orange 8 (AO8)) with different structure and different substitute groups has been investigated using supported TiO2 photocatalyst under UV light irradiation. All the experiments were performed in a circulation photochemical reactor equipped with a 15-W UV lamp emitted around 365 nm. The investigated photocatalyst was industrial Millennium PC-500 (crystallites mean size 5-10nm) immobilized on glass plates by a heat attachment method. SEM images of the immobilized TiO2 nanoparticles showed the good coating on the plates, after repeating the deposition procedure three times. Our results indicated that the photocatalytic decolorization kinetics of the dyes were in the order of AO10 > AO12 > AO8. Photocatalytic mineralization of the dyes was monitored by total organic carbon (TOC) decrease, changes in UV-vis spectra and ammonium ion formation. The dye solutions could be completely decolorized and effectively mineralized, with an average overall TOC removal larger than 94% for a photocatalytic reaction time of 6 h. The nitrogen-to-nitrogen double bond of the azo dyes was transformed predominantly into NH4+ ion. The kinetic of photocatalytic decolorization of the dyes was found to follow a first-order rate law. The photocatalysis efficiency was evaluated by figure-of-merit electrical energy per order (E-EO). (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据