4.7 Article

Evaluation of trihalomethane formation potential in function of oxidation processes used during the drinking water production process

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 172, 期 2-3, 页码 661-666

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.048

关键词

Trihalomethane; Natural organic matter; Advanced oxidation process

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia
  2. Gobierno de Aragon
  3. Fundacion Caixa Cataluna [CTM 2005-04585, CTM 2008-01876/TECNO]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of natural organic matter (NOM) in both surface and groundwater supplies produces toxic by-products, mainly trihalomethanes (THMs), during oxidation steps in drinking water production. This research work shows the efficiency of different advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) based on ozone for the degradation of precursors of trihalomethanes in aqueous solutions. Completed treatments comprised different preoxidation processes (chlorination and AOP: O(3),O(3)/H(2)O(2), O(3)/TiO(2) and O(3)/H(2)O(2)/TiO(2)). adsorption with PAC (optional operation), coagulation-flocculation and final postchlorination applied to synthetic samples which were prepared by dilution of the soluble fraction of a humic solution. A direct chlorination of synthetic humic samples which display dissolved organic carbon close to 3 mg l(-1) produced a THM concentration of around 1600 mu gCCl(3) l(-1) (measured as THMFP). Comparisons between the trihalomethane formation potential of initial synthetic samples and samples treated by prechlorination and coagulation-flocculation-decantation show that the main factor responsible for THM reduction is the coagulation-flocculation process since a decrease of 90% is achieved. Considering the various completed treatments studied. the most recommendable include preoxidation by ozonation, adsorption by PAC. coagulation-flocculation using aluminium sulphate followed by decantation and final postchlorination. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据