4.7 Article

Adsorption of aqueous metal ions on cattle-manure-compost based activated carbons

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 170, 期 2-3, 页码 1119-1124

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.090

关键词

Activated carbon; Adsorption isotherm; Cattle-manure-compost; Copper; Lead; Solution pH

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [20510072]
  2. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
  3. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  4. Safety and Health Organization, Chiba University
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20510072] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study is to examine the suitability and performance of cattle-manure-compost(CMC) based activated carbons in removing heavy metal ions from aqueous solution. The influence of ZnCl2 activation ratios and solution pH on the removal of Cu(II) and Pb(II) were studied. Pore texture. available surface functional groups, pH of point zero charge (pH(PZC)), thermogravimetric analysis and elemental compositions were obtained to characterize the activated carbons. Batch adsorption technique was used to determine the metal-binding ability of activated carbons. The equilibrium data were characterized using Langmuir, Freundlich and Redlich-Peterson models. It was found that the uptake of aqueous metal ions by activated carbons could be well described by Langmuir equation. It is suggested that the increase of surface area and mesopore ratio as a result of increasing activation ratios favored the removal of Cu(II), while activated carbon rich in acidic groups showed selective adsorption towards Pb(II). The preferable removal of Cu(II) over Pb(II) could be due to the rich nitrogen content as well as the higher mesoporous surface area in the CIVIC activated carbons. The impregnated CMC activated carbons also showed a better performance for Cu(II) removal at varying solution pH than Filtrasorb 400 (17400), while a similar performance was observed for Pb(II) removal. (C) 2009 Elsevier BY. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据