4.7 Article

Aqueous heavy metals removal by adsorption on amine-functionalized mesoporous silica

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 163, 期 1, 页码 213-221

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.080

关键词

Heavy metal removal; Mesoporous silica; Amine-functionalized SBA-15; Adsorption; Wastewater treatment

资金

  1. REMTAVARES [S0505/AMB/0395]
  2. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia [CFM2005-01053]
  3. CONSOLIDER INGENIO 2010 [CSD2006-44]
  4. [URJC-CM-2007-CET-1674]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amino functional mesoporous silica SBA-15 materials have been prepared to develop efficient adsorbents of heavy metals in wastewater. Functionalization with amino groups has been carried out by using two independent methods, grafting and co-condensation. Three organic moieties have been selected to incorporate the active amino sites: aminopropyl (H2N-(CH2)(3)-), [2-aminoethylamino]-propyl (H2N-(CH2)(2)-NH-(CH2)(3)-) and [(2-aminoethylamino)-ethylamino]-propyl (H2N-(CH2)(2)-NH-(CH2)(2)-NH-(CH2)(3)-). Materials have been characterized by XRD, nitrogen sorption measurements and chemical analysis. We have found that all materials preserve the mesoscopic order and exhibit suitable textural properties and nitrogen contents to act as potential adsorbents. Metal removal from aqueous solution has been examined for Cu(II), Ni(II), Pb(II), Cd(II), and Zn(II); adsorption performances of materials prepared by the two functionalization methods have been compared. In addition, copper adsorption process has been thoroughly studied from both kinetic and equilibrium points of view for some selected materials. Aqueous Cu(II) adsorption rates show that the overall process is fast and the time evolution can be successfully reproduced with a pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Whole copper adsorption isotherms have been obtained at 25 degrees C. Significant maximum adsorption capacities have been found with excellent behavior at low concentration. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据