4.7 Article

Adsorption of low concentration phosphine in yellow phosphorus off-gas by impregnated activated carbon

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 171, 期 1-3, 页码 588-593

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.046

关键词

Activated carbon; Adsorption; PH3

资金

  1. 863 National High-tech Development Plan Foundation [2004AA649040]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50708044]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to utilize high concentration CO comprehensively, impregnated activated carbon sorbent and the catalytic oxidation reaction for PH3 were investigated in this study. Carbon was impregnated with HCI, KNO3, or hexanediol. The activated carbon modified by 7% (mass fraction) HCI could enhance the adsorption purification ability significantly. Raising the reaction temperature or increasing the oxygen content of the gas can improve the purification efficiency. The structure of the materials after modification was determined using nitrogen adsorption. The modification decreased the volume of pores smaller than 2 nm in diameter with the most noticeable change occurring in the micropores ranging from 0.3 nm to 1.5 nm in diameter. Decreases in micropore volume accounted for 87% of the total pore volume change. After the adsorption. the surface areas decreased 28%, 29% of which was due to decreased micropore surface. HCI significantly increased the performance of carbon as a PH3 adsorbent when HCI impregnation was applied whereas the effects of other materials used in this study were much less pronounced. HCI present in the small pores probably acted as a catalyst for oxygen activation that caused PH3 oxidation. As a result of this process, H3PO4 and P4O10 were formed, strongly adsorbed, and present in the small pores ranging from 0.3 nm to 1.5 nm. In conclusion, this study provides evidence that CO from industrial off-gas can be purified and used as the raw material for a broader range of products. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据