4.7 Article

Adsorption kinetics and isotherm of anionic dyes onto organo-bentonite from single and multisolute systems

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 172, 期 1, 页码 99-107

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.139

关键词

Adsorption isotherm; Kinetics; Mixed dyes; Organo-bentonite; Polyelectrolyte

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [Y2007B06, Y2008B12]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [50578089]
  3. National Science Technology [2006BAJ08B05-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performances of polydiallydimethylammonium modified bentonite (PDADMA-bentonite) as an adsorbent to remove anionic dyes, namely Acid Scarlet GR (AS-GR), Acid Turquoise Blue 2G (ATB-2G) and Indigo Carmine (IC), were investigated in single, binary and ternary dye systems. In adsorption from single dye solutions with initial concentration of 100 mu mol/L, the dosage of PDADMA-bentonite needed to remove 95% dye was 0.42, 0.68 and 0.75 g/L for AS-GR, ATB-2G and IC, respectively. The adsorption isotherms of the three dyes obeyed the Langmuir isotherm model with the equilibrium constants of 0.372, 0.629 and 4.31 L/mu mol, the saturation adsorption amount of 176.3, 149.2 and 228.7 mu mol/g for ATB-2G, IC and AS-GR, respectively. In adsorption from mixed dye solutions, the isotherm of each individual dye followed an expanded Langmuir isotherm model and the relationship between the total amount of dyes adsorbed and the total equilibrium dye concentration was interpreted well by Langmuir isotherm model. In the region of insufficient dosage of PDADMA-bentonite, the dye with a larger affinity was preferentially removed by adsorption. Desorption was observed in the kinetic curve of the dye with lower affinity on PDADMA-bentonite surface by the competitive adsorption. The kinetics in single dye solution and the total adsorption of dyes in binary and ternary dye systems nicely followed pseudo-second-order kinetic model. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据