4.7 Article

Effects of adsorbent dose, its particle size and initial arsenic concentration on the removal of arsenic, iron and manganese from simulated ground water by Fe3+ impregnated activated carbon

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 150, 期 3, 页码 695-702

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.05.040

关键词

arsenic; GAC; iron impregnated activated carbon; surface modified adsorbent; manganese; adsorption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the observations of the study on arsenic removal from a contaminated ground water (simulated) by adsorption onto Fe3+ impregnated granular activated carbon (GAC-Fe). Fe2+, Fe3+ and Mn2+ have also been considered along with arsenic species in the water sample. Similar study has also been done with untreated granular activated carbon (GAC) for comparison. The effects of adsorbent dose, particle size of adsorbent and initial arsenic concentration on the removal of As(T), As(III), As(V), Fe2+, Fe3+ and Mn2+ have been discussed. Under the experimental conditions, the optimum adsorbent doses for GAC-Fe and GAC have been found to be 8 g/l and 24 g/l, respectively with an agitation time of 15 h. Particle size of the adsorbents (both GAC and GAC-Fe) has shown negligible effect on the removal of arsenic and Fe species. However, for Mn removal the effect of adsorbent particle size is comparatively more. Percentage removal of As(T), As(V) and As(III) increase with the decrease in initial arsenic concentration (As-0). However, the increase in percentage removal of all the arsenic species with decrease in As-0 are less for higher value of As-0 (3000-500 ppb) than those of the lower value of As-0 (500-10 ppb). The % removal of As(T), As(III), As(V), Fe, and Mn were similar to 95 %, 92.4%, 97.6%, 99% and 41.2%, respectively when 8 g/l GAC-Fe was used at the As-0 value of 200 ppb. However, for GAC these values were similar to 55.5%, 44%, 71%, 98% and 97%. The pH and temperature of the study were 7 +/- 0.1 and 30 +/- 1 degrees C, respectively. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据