4.7 Article

Color removal from textile dyebath effluents in a zeolite fixed bed reactor: Determination of optimum process conditions using Taguchi method

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 159, 期 2-3, 页码 348-353

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.02.065

关键词

Adsorption; Real textile wastewater; Color removal; Taguchi method; Zeolite; Modification

资金

  1. Istanbul Technical University [31581]
  2. Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [105Y288]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Taguchi method was applied as an experimental design to determine optimum conditions for color removal from textile dyebath house effluents in a zeolite fixed bed reactor. After the parameters were determined to treat real textile wastewater, adsorption experiments were carried out. The breakthrough curves for adsorption studies were constructed under different conditions by plotting the normalized effluent color intensity (C/C-o) versus time (min) or bed volumes (BV). The chosen experimental parameters and their ranges are: HTAB concentration (C-htab), 1-7.5 g L-1; HTAB feeding flowrate (Q(htab)), 0.015-0.075 L min(-1); textile wastewater flowrate (Q(dye)), 0.025-0.050 L min(-1) and zeolite bed height (H-bed), 25-50 cm, respectively. Mixed orthogonal array L-16 (4(2) x 2(2)) for experimental plan and the larger the better response category were selected to determine the optimum conditions. The optimum conditions were found to be as follows: HTAB concentration (C-htab) = 1 g L-1, HTAB feeding flowrate (Q(htab)) = 0.015 L min(-1), textile wastewater flowrate (Q(dye)) = 0.025 L min(-1) and bed height (H-bed) = 50 cm. Under these conditions, the treated wastewater volume reached a maximum while the bed volumes (BV) were about 217. While HTAB concentration, g L-1 (A); zeolite bed height, cm (D) and wastewater flowrate, L min(-1) (C) were found to be significant parameters, respectively, whereas, HTAB flowrate, L min(-1) (B) was found to be an insignificant parameter. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据