4.7 Article

Swelling pressure and hydraulic conductivity of compacted GMZ01 bentonite under salinization-desalinization cycle conditions

期刊

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 454-460

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2015.06.033

关键词

Bentonite; Swelling pressure; Hydraulic conductivity; Salinization-desalinization cycle; Radioactive waste disposal

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41422207, 41272287]
  2. China Atomic Energy Authority [[2011]1051]
  3. Pujiang Program of Shanghai [13PJD029]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compacted bentonite has been used as buffer material in radioactive waste disposal. Once compacted bentonite is emplaced, the chemical composition of site water is changed due to the long-term interaction between the bentonite, surrounding rock and the concrete facility; therefore the hydraulic mechanical behavior of compacted bentonite should be evaluated for the disposal safety. In this study, the swelling pressure and hydraulic conductivity of compacted GMZ01 bentonite were investigated under salinization desalinization chemical cycles using a newly developed apparatus. Results show that the salinization process leads a reducing of swelling pressure and the desalination process leads to an increasing of swelling pressure; the hydraulic conductivity increases in the salinization process while decreases in the desalinization process. The variation magnitude of the swelling pressure and hydraulic conductivity is related to the solution concentration applied. Meanwhile, the initial chemical condition and chemical cycle paths have a significant effect in the swelling characteristics and hydraulic properties. Since the salinization-desalinization cycle is expected to occur over a long time during the operation of the repository, the monitoring of the buffer materials will be important for the disposal safety. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据