4.6 Article

The EvoSpace Model for Pool-Based Evolutionary Algorithms

期刊

JOURNAL OF GRID COMPUTING
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 329-349

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10723-014-9319-2

关键词

Pool-based evolutionary algorithms; Distributed evolutionary algorithms; Heterogeneous computing platforms for bioinspired algorithms; Parameter setting

资金

  1. CONACYT (Mexico) from the Programa de Estimulo a la Innovacion [29537]
  2. CONACYT Basic Science Research Project [178323]
  3. DGEST (Mexico) [5149.13-P, 5414.14-P, TIJ-ING-2012-110]
  4. IRSES project ACoB-SEC - European Commission
  5. Andalusian Regional Government [P08-TIC-03903]
  6. project CANUBE - CEI-BioTIC UGR
  7. FEDER [GRU10029]
  8. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [TIN2011-28627-C04-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work presents the EvoSpace model for the development of pool-based evolutionary algorithms (Pool-EA). Conceptually, the EvoSpace model is built around a central repository or population store, incorporating some of the principles of the tuple-space model and adding additional features to tackle some of the issues associated with Pool-EAs; such as, work redundancy, starvation of the population pool, unreliability of connected clients or workers, and a large parameter space. The model is intended as a platform to develop search algorithms that take an opportunistic approach to computing, allowing the exploitation of freely available services over the Internet or volunteer computing resources within a local network. A comprehensive analysis of the model at both the conceptual and implementation levels is provided, evaluating performance based on efficiency, optima found and speedup, while providing a comparison with a standard EA and an island-based model. The issues of lost connections and system parametrization are studied and validated experimentally with encouraging results, that suggest how EvoSpace can be used to develop and implement different Pool-EAs for search and optimization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据