4.1 Article

The Fovea-BMO Axis Angle and Macular Thickness Vertical Asymmetry Across The Temporal Raphe

期刊

JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA
卷 27, 期 11, 页码 993-998

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001077

关键词

fovea-BMO angle; vertical macular asymmetry; temporal raphe

资金

  1. Heidelberg Engineering
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To test the hypothesis that the fovea-Bruch's membrane opening (FoBMO) axis angle influences the thickness symmetry of the macular ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) across the temporal horizontal meridian in normal subjects. Design: Cross-sectional diagnostic study at a tertiary academic center. Methods: One hundred sixteen eyes of 60 normal subjects aged 40 to 85 years underwent spectral domain optical coherence tomography(SD-OCT) imaging. The FoBMO angle was estimated on en face infrared SD-OCT images. Posterior Pole algorithm images acquired with Spectralis SD-OCT were used to define vertical asymmetry as follows. The average thickness difference between the 3 most temporal superpixels above and below the horizontal meridian, the second row of superpixels from the horizontal meridian, and 3 central superpixels above and below the horizontal meridian were calculated. Factors influencing GCIPL thickness asymmetry were explored and changes in thickness asymmetry as a function of FoBMO angle were investigated. Results: No demographic or clinical factors affected temporal GCIPL asymmetry (P>0.05 for all). A more (negatively) tilted FoBMO angle was associated with relatively thinner inferior compared with superior GCIPL thickness in superpixels immediately adjacent to the temporal raphe (P<0.001). The second row of temporal superpixels from the horizontal meridian (P=0.349) or central superpixels (P=0.292) did not show this tendency. Conclusions: Vertical GCIPL symmetry across the horizontal meridian is influenced by the FoBMO angle. SD-OCT algorithms using vertical asymmetry as a diagnostic index should be adjusted for the FoBMO angle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据