4.1 Article

Change in Intraocular Pressure Measurement After Myopic LASEK: A Study Evaluating Goldmann, Pascal and Applanation Resonance Tonometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 255-259

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31820719c8

关键词

LASEK; Goldmann applanation tonometry; dynamic contour tonometry; intraocular pressure; applanation resonance tonometry

资金

  1. Kronprinsessan Margaretas Arbetsnamnd
  2. Insamlingsstiftelsen for medicinsk forskning at Umea University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate 3 tonometry methods-the gold standard, Goldmann applanation tonometry, a new method, Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (PDCT), and a method under development, applanation resonance tonometry (ART)-with respect to intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements before, 3 and 6 months after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK). Materials and Methods: One randomly assigned eye of each of 53 healthy individuals, who underwent LASEK surgery for myopia was studied. Visual acuity, central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and IOP were measured at each visit. Six IOP measurements/methods with 5 minutes pause between methods were performed. Results: All tonometry methods measured a significantly lower IOP after LASEK correction by a mean of -3.1 diopters. The IOP reduction was largest after 6 months for Goldmann applanation tonometry (-1.7 +/- 1.8mm Hg) followed by ART(stat) (-1.2 +/- 1.5mm Hg), PDCT (-1.1 +/- 1.6mm Hg), and ART(dyn) (-1.0 +/- 1.5mm Hg). The reduction of IOP did not differ significantly between different methods (P = 0.11). There was a significant further reduction of measured IOP for PDCT between 3 and 6 months (-0.5 +/- 1.0mm Hg). Uncorrected visual acuity improved significantly between 3 and 6 months postoperatively from 1.32 +/- 0.28 to 1.43 +/- 0.27. Conclusions: All tonometry methods measured a significant, but low, reduction of IOP 3 and 6 months after LASEK. Further change in visual acuity and IOP measurements between 3 and 6 months suggest a still ongoing postoperative process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据