4.4 Article

Analysis of a GRACE global mascon solution for Gulf of Alaska glaciers

期刊

JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY
卷 59, 期 217, 页码 913-924

出版社

INT GLACIOL SOC
DOI: 10.3189/2013JoG12J197

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA under the GRACE Science Team [NNH10ZDA001N, NNH09ZDA001N-IDS, NNX08AV52G]
  2. Department of Interior Alaska Climate Science Center
  3. USGS Climate and Land Use Change program
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Division Of Earth Sciences [0911764] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. NASA [NNX08AV52G, 94792] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a high-resolution Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mascon solution for Gulf of Alaska (GOA) glaciers and compare this with in situ glaciological, climate and other remote-sensing observations. Our GRACE solution yields a GOA glacier mass balance of -65 +/- 11 Gta(-1) for the period December 2003 to December 2010, with summer balances driving the interannual variability. Between October/November 2003 and October 2009 we obtain a mass balance of -61 +/- 11 Gta(-1) from GRACE, which compares well with -65 +/- 12 Gta(-1) from ICESat based on hypsometric extrapolation of glacier elevation changes. We find that mean summer (June-August) air temperatures derived from both ground and lower-troposphere temperature records were good predictors of GRACE-derived summer mass balances, capturing 59% and 72% of the summer balance variability respectively. Large mass losses during 2009 were likely due to low early melt season surface albedos, measured by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and likely associated with the 31 March 2009 eruption of Mount Redoubt, southwestern Alaska. GRACE data compared well with in situ measurements at Wolverine Glacier (maritime Alaska), but poorly with those at Gulkana Glacier (interior Alaska). We conclude that, although GOA mass estimates from GRACE are robust over the entire domain, further constraints on subregional and seasonal estimates are necessary to improve fidelity to ground observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据