4.3 Article

Angular momentum budget in General Circulation Models of superrotating atmospheres: A critical diagnostic

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2012JE004223

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy, by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  2. NASA [NNX11AD67G, NNX11AH82G]
  3. NASA [147260, NNX11AD67G, NNX11AH82G, 144957] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To help understand the large disparity in the results of circulation modeling for the atmospheres of Titan and Venus, where the whole atmosphere rotates faster than the surface (superrotation), the atmospheric angular momentum budget is detailed for two General Circulation Models (GCMs). The LMD GCM is tested for both Venus (with simplified and with more realistic physical forcings) and Titan (realistic physical forcings). The Community Atmosphere Model is tested for both Earth and Venus with simplified physical forcings. These analyses demonstrate that errors related to atmospheric angular momentum conservation are significant, especially for Venus when the physical forcings are simplified. Unphysical residuals that have to be balanced by surface friction and mountain torques therefore affect the overall circulation. The presence of topography increases exchanges of angular momentum between surface and atmosphere, reducing the impact of these numerical errors. The behavior of GCM dynamical cores with regard to angular momentum conservation under Venus conditions provides an explanation of why recent GCMs predict dissimilar results despite identical thermal forcing. The present study illustrates the need for careful and detailed analysis of the angular momentum budget for any GCM used to simulate superrotating atmospheres. Citation: Lebonnois, S., C. Covey, A. Grossman, H. Parish, G. Schubert, R. Walterscheid, P. Lauritzen, and C. Jablonowski (2012), Angular momentum budget in General Circulation Models of superrotating atmospheres: A critical diagnostic, J. Geophys. Res., 117, E12004, doi:10.1029/2012JE004223.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据