4.3 Article

Flower structures and Riedel shears at a step over zone along the Alpine Fault (New Zealand) inferred from 2-D and 3-D GPR images

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2011JB008749

关键词

-

资金

  1. ETH Zurich
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation
  3. Landmark Graphics Corporation via the Landmark University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-resolution GPS and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data are used to detect and identify hidden faults along a stretch of the transpressional Alpine Fault (South Island, New Zealand) immediately north of its junction with the Hope Fault. At this location, the Alpine Fault emerges from the basement into a sequence of variably thick late Holocene gravel deposits. Geomorphology and trenching already mapped three principal fault strands and two distinct step over zones at the study site. Our GPR images reveal numerous additional secondary fault strands throughout the region, only some of which are obvious at the surface or in the trench walls. According to the GPR data, the main fault-generated disturbance zone has a width ranging from similar to 40 to similar to 200 m. The secondary fault strands outside of the step over zones likely represent the branches of positive flower structures, whereas the faulting pattern around the step over zones is best explained in terms of linked Riedel shears. Systematic northeastward increases in the width of the main fault-generated disturbance zone and corresponding increases in principal fault-scarp height are the likely consequences of older terraces in the northeast being disrupted and offset by more earthquakes than younger terraces in the southwest. The pattern of complex faulting in this region is distinct from the system of alternating strike-slip and reverse faults characteristic of the Alpine Fault to the south and from the rather simple sequence of faults mapped to the north. GPR surveying has added new information on the distribution and nature of faulting at our study site.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据