4.3 Article

Investigation of land ice-ocean interaction with a fully coupled ice-ocean model: 1. Model description and behavior

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2011JF002246

关键词

-

资金

  1. Princeton AOS Postdoctoral and Visiting Scientist Program
  2. NSF [ANT-1103375, ANT-0838811, ARC-0934534]
  3. Princeton Carbon Mitigation Initiative
  4. STEP program in the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University
  5. Directorate For Geosciences
  6. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [0934534, 0838811] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Polar Programs
  8. Directorate For Geosciences [1103375] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antarctic ice shelves interact closely with the ocean cavities beneath them, with ice shelf geometry influencing ocean cavity circulation, and heat from the ocean driving changes in the ice shelves, as well as the grounded ice streams that feed them. We present a new coupled model of an ice stream-ice shelf-ocean system that is used to study this interaction. The model is capable of representing a moving grounding line and dynamically responding ocean circulation within the ice shelf cavity. Idealized experiments designed to investigate the response of the coupled system to instantaneous increases in ocean temperature show ice-ocean system responses on multiple timescales. Melt rates and ice shelf basal slopes near the grounding line adjust in 1-2 years, and downstream advection of the resulting ice shelf thinning takes place on decadal timescales. Retreat of the grounding line and adjustment of grounded ice takes place on a much longer timescale, and the system takes several centuries to reach a new steady state. During this slow retreat, and in the absence of either an upward-or downward-sloping bed or long-term trends in ocean heat content, the ice shelf and melt rates maintain a characteristic pattern relative to the grounding line.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据