4.3 Article

Gross primary production estimation from MODIS data with vegetation index and photosynthetically active radiation in maize

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2009JD013023

关键词

-

资金

  1. China's Special Funds for Major State Basic Research Project [2007CB714406]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-YW-313]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science [KQ060006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gross primary production (GPP) is a significant important parameter for carbon cycle and climate change research. Remote sensing combined with other climate and meteorological data offers a convenient tool for large-scale GPP estimation. GPP was estimated as a product of vegetation indices (VIs) and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). Four kinds of vegetation indices [the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), the weighted difference vegetation index, the soil-adjusted vegetation index, and the enhanced vegetation index (EVI)] derived from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer daily surface reflectance product were selected to test our method. The in situ GPP was calculated using the eddy covariance technique and the PAR data were acquired from meteorological measurements. Because VIs were found to be a reliable proxy of both light use efficiency (LUE) and the fraction of absorbed PAR (f(APAR); R-2 of 0.63-0.87 for LUE and 0.69-0.76 for f(APAR)), the product VI x VI x PAR is used as a measure of GPP according to Monteith logic. Moderate determination coefficients R-2 from 0.65 for NDVI to 0.71 for EVI were obtained when GPP was estimated from a single index in maize. When testing our method, calculating GPP as a product of VI x VI x PAR, the determination coefficients R-2 largely improved, fluctuating from 0.81 to 0.91. EVI x EVI x PAR provided the best estimation of GPP with the highest R-2 of 0.91 because EVI was found to be the best indicator of both LUE and f(APAR) (R-2 of 0.87 and 0.76, respectively). These results will be helpful for the development of future GPP estimation models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据