4.3 Article

Errors of Interannual Variability and Trend in Dynamical Downscaling of Reanalysis

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2009JD013511

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) [NA17RJ1231]
  2. California Energy Commission Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) [MGC-04-04]
  3. Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program [CATER 2007-4406]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interannual variability of dynamically downscaled analysis and its error relative to global coarse resolution analysis is examined in this paper. The regional model error is shown to significantly contaminate the interannual variability of the seasonal mean. The error occupies a significant part of the interannual variability, particularly during the summer season. Accordingly, the leading modes of empirical orthogonal functions (EOFs) of 500 hPa height in the region differ greatly from those of global analysis. In this paper a variant of spectral nudging, the scale selective bias correction (SSBC) method, is refined to further reduce the error within the observational error. Application of this method in dynamical downscaling reduced the error of the interannual variability of analysis fields (namely, height, temperature, and winds), and made the EOFs of seasonal mean at 500 hPa height agree well with those of the global analysis. Application of the SSBC had a modest impact on model-derived fields, such as precipitation and near-surface air temperature. The improvements in these fields are not as dramatic as those in the analysis fields, but the increased simulation skill is evident. A possible cause of the error in the interannual variability is discussed. No apparent systematic reduction in high-frequency variability is found, and the error in interannual variability is more likely due to excitation of the stationary computational mode by the lateral boundary forcing and ill-posed lateral boundary condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据