4.3 Article

Case studies of the mesospheric response to recent minor, major, and extended stratospheric warmings

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2010JD014114

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research
  2. NASA [NNH09AK64I]
  3. Defense Threat Reduction Agency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have studied the mesospheric response to two recent stratospheric warmings by performing short-term forecasts at medium (1.5 degrees) and high (0.5 degrees) spatial resolution under different gravity wave drag (GWD) scenarios. We validated our models with our high-altitude analysis that extends from 0 to 90 km. For the minor warming of January 2008, reduced upper-level orographic GWD weakened the downward residual circulation and cooled the mesosphere. Parameterized nonorographic GWD increased the simulated mesospheric cooling. For the prolonged major warming of 2006, heavily attenuated orographic GWD led to pronounced cooling near 50 km. During the extended phase of this event, an unusually strong westerly polar vortex reformed in the lower mesosphere, which allowed westward propagating nonorographic gravity waves to reach the mesosphere and break, with net westward accelerations of over 50 ms(-1) d(-1). This, in turn, forced a strong residual circulation, yielding descent velocities over 2 cm s(-1) between 65 degrees N and 85 degrees N, consistent with previous reports of enhanced downward transport of trace constituents. The resulting adiabatic heating, as evidenced by the unusually vertically displaced stratopause at 80 km, is likely a direct consequence of this enhanced gravity wave driven descent. High-resolution simulations without parameterized GWD were closer to the analysis than medium-resolution simulations with parameterized orographic GWD only, but still did not fully simulate the mesospheric thermal response. Specifically, the 80 km temperature enhancement was still underestimated in these simulations. This suggests that higher spatial resolution is needed to adequately resolve extratropical gravity wave momentum fluxes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据