4.3 Article

CH4 retrievals from space-based solar backscatter measurements: Performance evaluation against simulated aerosol and cirrus loaded scenes

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2010JD014514

关键词

-

资金

  1. Dutch User Support Programme [GO-2005/064]
  2. European Union [FP7/2007-2013, 218793]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monitoring of atmospheric methane (CH4) concentrations from space-based instruments such as the Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography (SCIAMACHY) and the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) relies on observations of sunlight backscattered to space by the Earth's surface and atmosphere. Retrieval biases occur due to unaccounted scattering effects by aerosols and thin cirrus that modify the lightpath. Here, we evaluate the accuracy of two retrieval methods that aim at minimizing such scattering induced errors. The lightpath proxy method, applicable to SCIAMACHY and GOSAT, retrieves CH4 and carbon dioxide (CO2) simultaneously and uses CO2 as a proxy for lightpath modification. The physics-based method, which we propose for GOSAT, aims at simultaneously retrieving CH4 concentrations and scattering properties of the atmosphere. We evaluate performance of the methods against a trial ensemble of simulated aerosol and cirrus loaded scenes. More than 80% of the trials yield residual scattering induced CH4 errors below 0.6% and 0.8% for the proxy and the physics-based approach, respectively. Very few cases result in errors greater than 2% for both methods. Advantages of the proxy approach are efficient and robust performance yielding more useful retrievals than the physics-based method which reveals some nonconvergent cases. The major disadvantage of the proxy method is the uncertainty of the proxy CO2 concentration contributing to the overall error budget. Residual errors generally correlate with particle and surface properties and thus might impact inverse modeling of CH4 sources and sinks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据