4.3 Article

Present-day strain accumulation and slip rates associated with southern San Andreas and eastern California shear zone faults

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2010JB007424

关键词

-

资金

  1. USGS [06HQGR0008, 07HQGR0055, 08HQGR0023, 02HQAG0008]
  2. SCEC [08173]
  3. NSF [EAR-0119934, EAR-0844400, EAR-0106924]
  4. University of Arizona
  5. Colorado College
  6. Southern California Earthquake Center
  7. Directorate For Geosciences
  8. Division Of Earth Sciences [0844400] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the first results from a dense network of 36 campaign and 46 continuous GPS stations located in the Eastern Transverse Ranges Province (ETR), a transition zone between the southernmost San Andreas fault (SSAF) and eastern California shear zone (ECSZ). We analyzed the campaign data together with available data from continuous GPS stations for the period 1994-2009. We used the GPS velocity estimates to constrain elastic block models to investigate fault-loading rates representing four hypotheses characterized by different fault-block geometries. Fault-block scenarios include blocks bounded by the east-striking left-lateral Pinto Mountain, Blue Cut, and Chiriaco faults of the ETR; blocks bounded by a right-lateral north-northwest striking structure (the Landers-Mojave earthquake line) that cuts obliquely across the ETR and mapped Mojave Desert faults; and combinations of these end-member hypotheses. Each model implies significantly different active fault geometries, block rotation rates, and slip rates for ETR and ECSZ structures. All models suggest that SSAF slip rate varies appreciably along strike, generally consistent with rates derived from tectonic geomorphology and paleoseismology, with a maximum of similar to 23 mm/yr right-lateral along the southernmost Coachella Valley strand, decreasing systematically to <10 mm/yr right-lateral through the San Gorgonio Pass region. Slip rate estimates for the San Jacinto fault are similar to 12 mm/yr for all models tested. All four models fit the data equally well in a statistical sense. Qualitative comparison among models and consideration of geologic slip rates and other independent data reveals strengths and weaknesses of each model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据