4.3 Article

Anisotropic stratification beneath Africa from joint inversion of SKS and P receiver functions

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2009JB006923

关键词

-

资金

  1. Russian Fund for Basic Research (RFBR) [10-05-00879]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The analysis of rock anisotropy revealed by seismic waves provides fundamental constraints on stress-strain field in the lithosphere and asthenosphere. Nevertheless, the anisotropicmodels resolved for the crust and the uppermantle using seismic waves sometimes show substantial discrepancies depending on the type of data analyzed. In particular, at several permanent stations located in Africa, previous studies revealed that the observations of SKS splitting are accounted for by models with a single and homogeneous anisotropic layer whereas 3-D tomographic models derived from surface waves exhibit clear anisotropic stratification. Here we tackle the issue of depth-dependent anisotropy by performing joint inversion of receiver functions (RF) and SKS waveforms at four permanent broadband stations along the East African Rift System (EARS) and also on the Congo Craton. For three out of the four stations studied, stratified models allow for the best fit of the data. The vertical variations in the anisotropic pattern show interesting correlations with changes in the thermomechanical state of the mantle associated with the lithosphere-asthenosphere transition and with the presence of hot mantle beneath the Afar region and beneath the EARS branches that surround the Tanzanian Craton. Our interpretation is consistent with the conclusion of earlier studies that suggest that beneath individual stations, multiple sources of anisotropy, chiefly olivine lattice preferred orientation and melt pocket shape preferred orientation in our case, exist at different depths. Our study further emphasizes that multiple layers of anisotropy must often be considered to obtain realistic models of the crust and upper mantle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据