4.3 Article

A satellite-based method for monitoring seasonality in the overstory leaf area index of Siberian larch forest

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2009JG000939

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [19201006, 18710020]
  2. Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales/Terre Ocean Surfaces Continentales Atmosphere (CNES/TOSCA) program of France
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18710020, 19201006] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reliable monitoring of the leaf area index (LAI) is required to further understand the carbon, water, and energy cycles of forests. In this study, we proposed a new satellite-based method to estimate the overstory LAI (LAI(o)) separately from the understory LAI (LAI(u)) for larch forests covering eastern Siberia. We modeled forest scenes representative of larch forest structure, with particular consideration of the typical clumped shoot structure of larch. Three-dimensional radiative transfer simulations were then conducted under various forest conditions to establish the relationships between LAI(o) and seasonal increases in the normalized difference water index after leaf appearance. Model-based sensitivity analyses indicated a maximum error of up to 26% under known noise levels. Averaged at the continental scale, total LAI from our estimates, the CYCLOPES version 3.1, and the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer MOD15 Collection 5 (main algorithm) showed similar ranges in summer. However, spatial pattern of LAI was slightly different, with smoother variability for CYCLOPES LAI. Our LAI and CYLOPES effective LAI reproduced a realistic seasonal variation with exact timing of spring increase in LAI(o). The main drawbacks of MOD15 Collection 5 were unrealistically strong temporal variability, and the fact that LAI began to increase earlier than the overstory leaf appearance date. Overall, the results show that our new method is a good alternative to MOD15 Collection 5 and CYCLOPES, as it provides separate estimates of LAI(o) and LAI(u) and true LAI instead of effective LAI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据