4.3 Article

Self-consistent inner magnetosphere simulation driven by a global MHD model

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2010JA015915

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA [NNH07AG24I, NNH09AL06I]
  2. National Science Foundation [ATM-0902941]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present results from a one-way coupling between the kinetic Ring Current Atmosphere Interactions Model with Self-Consistent B field (RAM-SCB) and the Space Weather Modeling Framework (SWMF). RAM-SCB obtains plasma distribution and magnetic field at model boundaries from the Block Adaptive Tree Solar Wind Roe Upwind Scheme (BATS-R-US) magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) model and convection potentials from the Ridley Ionosphere Model within SWMF. We simulate the large geomagnetic storm of 31 August 2005 (minimum SYM-H of -116 nT). Comparing SWMF output with Los Alamos National Laboratory geostationary satellite data, we find SWMF plasma to be too cold and dense if assumed to consist only of protons; this problem is alleviated if heavier ions are considered. With SWMF inputs, we find that RAM-SCB reproduces well storm time magnetosphere features: ring current morphology, dusk side peak, pitch angle anisotropy, and total energy. The RAM-SCB ring current and Dst are stronger than the SWMF ones and reproduce observations much better. The calculated field-aligned currents (FAC) compare reasonably well with 2 h averaged pictures from Iridium satellite data. As the ring current peak rotates duskward in the storm main phase, the region 2 FACs rotate toward noon, a feature also seen in observations. Finally, the RAM-SCB magnetic field outperforms both the dipole and the BATS-R-US field at Cluster and Polar spacecraft locations. This study shows the importance of a kinetic self-consistent approach and the sensitive dependence of the storm time inner magnetosphere on plasma sheet conditions and the cross polar cap potential. The study showcases the RAM-SCB capability as an inner magnetosphere module coupled with a global MHD model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据