4.3 Article

Lower plate structure and upper plate deformational segmentation at the Sunda-Banda arc transition, Indonesia

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2009JB006713

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [03G0190A, 03G0190B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Sunda-Banda arc transition at the eastern termination of the Sunda margin (Indonesia) represents a unique natural laboratory to study the effects of lower plate variability on upper plate deformational segmentation. Neighboring margin segments display a high degree of structural diversity of the incoming plate (transition from an oceanic to a continental lower plate, presence/absence of an oceanic plateau, variability of subducting seafloor morphology) as well as a wide range of corresponding fore-arc structures, including a large sedimentary basin and an accretionary prism/outer arc high of variable size and shape. Here, we present results of a combined analysis of seismic wide-angle refraction, multichannel streamer and gravity data recorded in two trench normal corridors located offshore the islands of Lombok (116 degrees E) and Sumba (119 degrees E). On the incoming plate, the results reveal a 8.6-9.0 km thick oceanic crust, which is progressively faulted and altered when approaching the trench, where upper mantle velocities are reduced to similar to 7.5 km/s. The outer arc high, located between the trench and the fore-arc basin, is characterized by sedimentary-type velocities (Vp < 5.5 km/s) down to the top of the subducting slab (similar to 13 km depth). The oceanic slab can be traced over 70-100 km distance beneath the fore arc. A shallow serpentinized mantle wedge at similar to 16 km depth offshore Lombok is absent offshore Sumba, where our models reveal the transition to the collisional regime farther to the east and to the Sumba block in the north. Our results allow a detailed view into the complex structure of both the deeper and shallower portions of the eastern Sunda margin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据