4.3 Article

Identification of aerosol type over the Arabian Sea in the premonsoon season during the Integrated Campaign for Aerosols, Gases and Radiation Budget (ICARB)

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2009JD011826

关键词

-

资金

  1. Indian Space Research Organization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A discrimination of the different aerosol types over the Arabian Sea (AS) during the Integrated Campaign for Aerosols, Gases and Radiation Budget (ICARB-06) is made using values of aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 500 nm (AOD(500)) and Angstrom exponent (alpha) in the spectral band 340-1020 nm (alpha(340-1020)). For this purpose, appropriate thresholds for AOD(500) and alpha(340-1020) are applied. It is shown that a single aerosol type in a given location over the AS can exist only under specific conditions while the presence of mixed aerosols is the usual situation. Analysis indicates that the dominant aerosol types change significantly in the different regions (coastal, middle, and far) of AS. Thus the urban/industrial aerosols are mainly observed in coastal AS, the desert dust particles occur in the middle and northern AS, while clear maritime conditions mainly occur in far AS. Spectral AOD and Angstrom exponent data were analyzed to obtain information about the adequacy of the simple use of the Angstrom exponent and spectral variation of a for characterizing the aerosols. Using the least squares method, a is calculated in the spectral interval 340-1020 nm along with the coefficients a(1) and a(2) of the second-order polynomial fit to the plotted logarithm of AOD versus the logarithm of wavelength. The results show that the spectral curvature can effectively be used as a tool for their discrimination, since the fine mode aerosols exhibit negative curvature, while the coarse mode particles exhibit positive curvature. The correlation between the coefficients a(1) and a(2) with the Angstrom exponent, and the atmospheric turbidity, is further investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据