4.3 Article

Additional stratospheric NOx production by relativistic electron precipitation during the 2004 spring NOx descent event

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2008JA013472

关键词

-

资金

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [bas0100023] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [bas0100023] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analyze in detail the February 2004 Global Ozone Monitoring by Occultation of Stars (GOMOS) NO2 observations in the northern polar latitudes during the springtime descent of NOx from the mesosphere into the stratosphere. We combine GOMOS observations with SABER-observed NO 5.3 mu m radiated power and an AARDDVARK-derived radio wave index (RWI) to describe the impact of the 11 February geomagnetic storm. Energetic electron precipitation generated some additional NOx, supplementing the original amounts that were already descending. At altitudes of 50-70 km, GOMOS observations of NO2 showed a delayed response to the geomagnetic storm, with NO2 being generated 3 days after the start of the storm. The delayed response and duration of NO2 production was found to be consistent with the increase in the flux of relativistic electrons measured by GOES at geostationary orbit and by POES through relativistic electron contamination of the >16 MeV proton channel. Using the Sodankyla Ion and Neutral Chemistry model (SIC), we found that a good fit to the observed NO2 mixing ratios at the peak of the geomagnetic storm effect was produced by a monoenergetic 1.25 MeV electron beam with a flux of similar to 0.3 x10(6) el cm(-2) sr(-1) s(-1) keV(-1) or with a hard'' electron spectra taken from Gaines et al. (1995) but with fluxes enhanced by a factor of 15, i.e., 8 x 10(4) el cm(-2) sr(-1) s(-1) for 2-6 MeV. Prior to the storm the descending NO2 had average mixing ratio values of similar to 150 ppbv. The geomagnetic storm-induced relativistic electron precipitation event doubled the amount of NOx descending into the stratosphere to similar to 300 ppbv after the storm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据