4.3 Article

Neural network-based estimates of North Atlantic surface pCO2 from satellite data: A methodological study

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2007JC004646

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union [511176]
  2. International Pacific Research Center [581]
  3. School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology [7619]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new method is proposed to estimate ocean surface pCO(2) from remotely sensed surface temperature and chlorophyll data. The method is applied to synthetic observations provided by an eddy-resolving biogeochemical model of the North Atlantic. The same model also provides a perfectly known simulated pCO(2) ground truth'' used to quantitatively assess the success of the estimation method. Model output is first sampled according to realistic voluntary observing ship (VOS) and satellite coverage. The model-generated VOS observations'' are then used to train a self-organizing neural network that is subsequently applied to model-generated satellite data'' of surface temperature and surface chlorophyll in order to derive basin-wide monthly maps of surface pCO(2). The accuracy of the estimated pCO(2) maps is analyzed with respect to the true'' surface pCO(2) fields simulated by the biogeochemical circulation model. We also investigate the accuracy of the estimated pCO(2) maps as a function of VOS line coverage, remote sensing errors, and the interpolation of missing remote sensing data due to cloud cover and low solar irradiation in winter. For a simulated sampling'' corresponding to VOS lines and patterns of optical satellite coverage of the year 2005, the neural net can successfully reproduce pCO(2) from model-generated remote sensing data'' of SST and Chl. Basin-wide RMS errors amount to 19.0 mu atm for a hypothetical perfect interpolation scheme for remote sensing data gaps and 21.1 mu atm when climatological surface temperature and chlorophyll values are used to fill in areas lacking optical satellite coverage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据