4.3 Article

Brittle versus ductile deformation as the main control on the transport properties of low-porosity anhydrite rocks

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2008JB005967

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/C001117/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An experimental approach has been taken to study the prefailure fluid flow properties of borehole samples of low-porosity anhydrites and the evolution of permeability (k) during deformation leading to brittle and ductile failure. The permeability measured under hydrostatic stress conditions prior to loading at room temperature is generally low (k = 10(-21) - 10(-19) m(2)) and displays an anisotropy and pressure sensitivity controlled by grain size and fabric orientation (foliation). Triaxial loading test results show that the brittle-ductile transition occurs for effective pressure P-e < 20 MPa and is almost independent of fabric orientation and grain size. All samples, whether deforming in a brittle (localized deformation) or ductile (distributed deformation) mode, show dilatancy after an initial phase of compaction. During loading, the k starts to increase prior to the phase of sample dilation and before the yield stress is attained. The k rise is characterized by an upward concave trend, prior to localized deformation (brittle failure), and by a downward concave trend, during distributed deformation (ductile failure). The k increase prior to brittle failure is about 1 order of magnitude higher than during ductile failure. We interpret the different shape of the k curve as due to the observed different degrees of fracture connectivity (widespread development of intragranular and intergranular fractures) reached during brittle (low) and ductile (high) deformation, respectively. Our experimental results imply that for low-porosity rocks the mode of failure, controlled by P-e, has an overwhelming effect on the evolution of permeability, compared to other factors such as grain size and fabric

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据