4.3 Article

Large-scale dynamics of Saturn's magnetopause: Observations by Cassini

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2008JA013265

关键词

-

资金

  1. PPARC research fellowship
  2. MSSL/UCL
  3. STFC [PP/D000912/1, PP/E001076/1, PP/E001173/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E001076/1, PP/D000912/1, PP/E001173/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The long-term statistical behavior of the large-scale structure of Saturn's magnetosphere has been investigated. Established statistical techniques for Jupiter have been applied to the kronian system, employing Cassini magnetometer data and a new empirical shape model of the magnetopause based on these data. The resulting distribution of standoff distance R-MP for Saturn, covering a time interval of similar to 400 days, is well-described by a dual'' or bimodal'' model-the sum of two normal distributions with different means at similar to 22 and similar to 27 planetary radii. We have made a comparison between the dual model's prediction for the probability distribution of solar wind dynamic pressure at Saturn with a sequence of observations from the Cassini Plasma Spectrometer (CAPS) instrument. Although the solar wind dynamic pressure observations are limited to a smaller time interval than the magnetometer data, we find that their overall range is in broad agreement with the that of the modeled pressures. However, the bimodal structure exhibited by the model is not apparent in the solar wind data for the corresponding range of dynamic pressures (similar to 0.008 - 0.06 nPa), which suggests that other mechanisms at Saturn also influence the size distribution of the magnetopause. Considering internal processes at Saturn and their influence on magnetopause size, we conclude that the effect of internal mass loading and loss from the magnetospheric disk is plausibly able to explain the observed bimodal distribution in magnetopause standoff distance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据