4.3 Article

Numerical simulations of the three-dimensional distribution of meteoric dust in the mesosphere and upper stratosphere

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2007JD009515

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. NASA Earth System Science [NNG05GQ75J]
  3. Aura [NNG06GE80G]
  4. NSF [ATM0435713]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Micrometeorites that ablate in the lower thermosphere and upper mesosphere are thought to recondense into nanometer-sized smoke particles and then coagulate into larger dust particles. Previous studies with one-dimensional models have determined that the meteoric dust size distribution is sensitive to the background vertical velocity and have speculated on the importance of the mesospheric meridional circulation to the dust spatial distribution. We conduct the first three-dimensional simulations of meteoric dust using a general circulation model with sectional microphysics to study the distribution and characteristics of meteoric dust in the mesosphere and upper stratosphere. We find that the mesospheric meridional circulation causes a strong seasonal pattern in meteoric dust concentration in which the summer pole is depleted and the winter pole is enhanced. This summer pole depletion of dust particles results in fewer dust condensation nuclei (CN) than has traditionally been assumed in numerical simulations of polar mesospheric clouds (PMCs). However, the total number of dust particles present is still sufficient to account for PMCs if smaller particles can nucleate to form ice than is conventionally assumed. During winter, dust is quickly transported down to the stratosphere in the polar vortex where it may participate in the nucleation of sulfate aerosols, the formation of the polar CN layer, and the formation of polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs). These predictions of the seasonal variation and resulting large gradients in dust concentration should assist the planning of future campaigns to measure meteoric dust.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据