4.3 Article

Mantle flow models with core-mantle boundary constraints and chemical heterogeneities in the lowermost mantle

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2007JB005080

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Decorrelation between s-wave and bulk sound velocities in the lowermost mantle and explicit density models based on seismic tomography give evidence for non-thermal lateral density variations in the lowermost mantle. Here we implement such variations in a numerical model of mantle flow driven by density anomalies which are derived from seismic tomography. In the lowermost approximate to 300 km, we either use both s-wave and bulk sound velocities to infer both thermal mantle density anomalies and non-thermal heterogeneities, or we assume that regions with s-wave speed anomalies below -1% have an additional non-thermal density anomaly. We predefine the shape of the viscosity profile in the upper mantle, transition zone and lower mantle, but absolute values of viscosity in the lithosphere, upper mantle, transition zone and lower mantle are free parameters. We use geoid, radial heat flux profile, viscosity Haskell'' average, core-mantle boundary (CMB) excess ellipticity, as well as (optionally) long-wavelength root mean square (RMS) CMB topography and reliable point estimates of CMB topography as constraints to optimize the model in parameter space in a least squares sense. We are able to obtain a reasonable fit to all data constraints. Computed RMS CMB topography is predominantly long-wavelength and with 1-1.5 km RMS amplitude somewhat larger than the long-wavelength component inferred from seismology. Geoid variance reduction is 75 to 83% in our preferred parameter range. Best fit models have a viscosity maximum close to 10 23 Pas about 600 km above the CMB, and a viscosity drop near the base of the mantle, corresponding to a thermal boundary layer about 300 km thick with temperature increase from approximate to 2500 to 3500-4000 K.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据